"After our Lord had said these things, clearly indicating that the word bread referred to his body because it was to be eaten, the Jews argued again with each other, saying, [6:52] How can this man give us his flesh to eat? When nature itself does not allow this. And they opposed what he was saying as something difficult and sinful as though he were asking them to really eat human flesh." (Theodore of Mopsuestia, Commentary on the Gospel of John, on 6:52, source)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Was Concupiscence Natural to Adam in Pure Nature?
The church of Rome does teach that concupiscence is not sin, but yet this is not all they have to say upon it. For not only do they deny it ...
-
This page contains a list of the articles I have written in particular subjects. The page is very big, so I have provided some jump links be...
-
A key word in the debate over the Qur'an's view of the Bible is the Arabic word ( tahrif ). Its most basic meaning is "to cor...
-
[The following is taken from the Select Disputations , 5:277-339] Before I approach the Problems, I define both the "what" and t...
No comments:
Post a Comment