"After our Lord had said these things, clearly indicating that the word bread referred to his body because it was to be eaten, the Jews argued again with each other, saying, [6:52] How can this man give us his flesh to eat? When nature itself does not allow this. And they opposed what he was saying as something difficult and sinful as though he were asking them to really eat human flesh." (Theodore of Mopsuestia, Commentary on the Gospel of John, on 6:52, source)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Eutyches and the Double Consubstantiality of Christ
During the Home Synod of Constantinople, Eutyches was summoned multiple times to appear before the assembly of bishops. On one such instan...
-
This page contains a list of the articles I have written in particular subjects. The page is very big, so I have provided some jump links be...
-
[The following is taken from the Select Disputations , 5:277-339] Before I approach the Problems, I define both the "what" and t...
-
Robert Bellarmine Perhaps one of the best Roman Catholic scholars and apologists in history would be Robert Bellarmine. His tome De Contro...
No comments:
Post a Comment