"After our Lord had said these things, clearly indicating that the word bread referred to his body because it was to be eaten, the Jews argued again with each other, saying, [6:52] How can this man give us his flesh to eat? When nature itself does not allow this. And they opposed what he was saying as something difficult and sinful as though he were asking them to really eat human flesh." (Theodore of Mopsuestia, Commentary on the Gospel of John, on 6:52, source)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Sufficient Grace and Effectual Calling: A Refutation of the Jesuits and Arminians
The various divisions of grace are not contractions of a genus into its species, nor any material distinction. Rather, for example, when w...
-
This page contains a list of the articles I have written in particular subjects. The page is very big, so I have provided some jump links be...
-
Every man who is anyway acquainted with the Protestant-Roman Catholic online dialogue scene is familiar with the classic "canon conun...
-
A key word in the debate over the Qur'an's view of the Bible is the Arabic word ( tahrif ). Its most basic meaning is "to cor...
No comments:
Post a Comment