"After our Lord had said these things, clearly indicating that the word bread referred to his body because it was to be eaten, the Jews argued again with each other, saying, [6:52] How can this man give us his flesh to eat? When nature itself does not allow this. And they opposed what he was saying as something difficult and sinful as though he were asking them to really eat human flesh." (Theodore of Mopsuestia, Commentary on the Gospel of John, on 6:52, source)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The Metaphysical Absurdity of Transubstantiation
Background in Aristotle “But there are different senses of 'coming to be'. In some cases we do not use the expression 'come to...
-
This page contains a list of the articles I have written in particular subjects. The page is very big, so I have provided some jump links be...
-
[The following is taken from the Select Disputations , 5:277-339] Before I approach the Problems, I define both the "what" and t...
-
As is well known by some, John Duns Scotus holds to the position that in Christ there is a created human act of existence distinct from th...
No comments:
Post a Comment